“I
testify that there is good and right and wrong on both
sides of the fence. And even more
shocking – we have far more in common with the ‘other’ side than we might
imagine…
I was loved form one side onto the other.”
– Abby Johnson on her
conversion from director of a Planned Parenthood clinic to pro-life activist
“Tom,
what’re you, crazy!” Emma shrieks at me. “This is getting dangerous! We gotta
get our kids out of here!”
I
come to my senses.
“Of
course. You’re right.”
I
help my wife pack up the children and walk them to the car.
“Thank
God,” Emma breathes. The baby is still unhappy, but his bawling has reduced
itself to more tolerable moaning, which can easily be corrected now that a
diaper change is on the way.
“I’ve
gotta go back,” I announce.
Emma
eyes me with disbelief.
“You’re
kidding, right?”
There’s
no time to explain, even if I understood why myself, which I don’t. It’s just a
gut feeling that I have something to add to the mayhem. Something good.
“I’ll
see you at home.”
“Tom,
why are you trying to be a hero?! This is crazy! Things are getting wild over
there! Besides, we only brought the one car!”
“Emma,
I have to go back there. You can pick
me up later. Or I’ll grab an Uber.”
I
raise my voice to silence the objections she’s starting to utter.
“Please,
Emma. Just take the kids home. I’ll be OK.”
Before
she can continue, and over the pleas of my older boy who cringes at arguments, I
return to the fray. I size up the situation, as I’ve learned to do quickly when
a classroom brawl breaks out. Over on the other side of the square, the priest appears
to be holding his own with the angry couple. Over here, where I am, a large
woman in a fleece jacket is arguing with Sarah, the music lady.
“Don’t you see, when you bring your trashy
music here while we’re trying to pray, it’s like you’re dancing on the graves
of the thousands of babies this place has killed? This place takes the womb,
which is supposed to be the safest place anywhere, and turns it into a tomb!”
The
pro-choicer is having none of it.
“First
of all, I happen to like my music, and don’t appreciate you calling it trashy.
The cops have been called more than once, and I’ve been assured I’m not
breaking any noise ordinances. If your group has freedom of speech to pray out
loud, I have the same right to play music at a reasonable volume. Secondly, think
before you call this a graveyard. This is a medical facility that provides much
more than abortion services. My gynecologists are here, serving me and other
low-income women. This place saves lives.”
The
pro-lifer must have decided to take Sarah’s music off the table and focus on
the bigger issue.
“Well,
what do you call it when they go into a woman’s womb and dismember her living child? They usually go in blindly because many
abortionists don’t use ultrasound to locate the baby inside. No, they’re just
hoping they can find their ‘target,’ which is the baby they’re trying to
destroy!”
I
wonder if I should step in and try to bring a more level tone to this
discussion. I agree with plaid jacket lady, and she just made a good point, but
her tone is so strident. If she could hear herself, she might reconsider her approach.
While I’m pondering this, Sarah starts with the “glob of tissue” argument.
“We
are not talking about a child. We’re talking about a mass of tissue which is
not yet living. We’re talking about –”
“Well,
let me tell you something, young lady,” the older woman cuts her off. Then, as
if reading my mind, plaid jacket lady tries a different tack.
“No,
I’d rather call you by name, you deserve that respect. It’s Sarah, isn’t it?”
The
music lady lets loose an exasperated sigh.
“Yes.
Fine. It’s Sarah.”
“Thank
you, Sarah. I’m Helen, and I started out pro-choice. I actually worked in a
clinic like this one for several years. I believed the same things you believe,
that I was doing good for society. I believed them when they told me their main
concern was to prevent unwanted pregnancy and disease, that they wanted
abortion to be ‘safe, legal and rare.’
“‘Safe,
legal and rare!’ That’s the rallying cry of abortion providers. You know what I
found out? Convenient Conception claims only three per cent of their services are
abortions, but do you know what that translates to? When you add their numbers
to the numbers of their other branch clinics country-wide, you find they’re
doing well over 300,000 a year! Sarah, do you realize almost 60 million babies
have been aborted in this country since Roe v. Wade?”
Undaunted,
Sarah replies, “Helen, I appreciate those statistics, but children need to be
loved if they’re gonna be brought into this world! Society can’t afford to care
for all the unwanted children that are being born every year. And if you’re
gonna talk statistics, how ’bout the fact that over 700,000 kids are abused
every year in this country by their own parents! That’s more than twice the
number of abortions you just mentioned. Can you imagine how much higher those
numbers would be if we didn’t have safe, legal abortions? Wouldn’t you rather
see a fetus painlessly removed from a uterus than let it be born into a life of
abuse or poverty?”
Helen
sighs.
“If
only it were painless,” she laments.
“Have you heard of Abby Johnson? She was a director at a Planned Parenthood
clinic. Defended the pro-choice cause for years. She had to assist in an
abortion one day. On this particular occasion, the doctor was using ultrasound
to see what he was doing. For the first time, she got to see with her own eyes
what was actually being done. She watched that baby flinch and try to move away
when the probe touched him. She saw those body parts being sucked out. They’re
called ‘products of conception,’ in the industry – I’ve heard Abby speak, and
she said they nicknamed them ‘pieces of children,’ which is more accurate. She
says she’s seen those body parts get sealed up in plastic bags, then incinerated.
Burned up! That’s what the Nazis did
after they killed Jews! Just burned them up like trash. Didn’t give them a
funeral ’cause they considered them sub-human.”
I
try to disengage from the ultra-agitated tone Helen’s still using and focus in
on the facts she’s sharing, because what she’s saying really is shocking. I
always knew abortion was murder, but I had no idea how cold-hearted the abortion
industry could be. I look to Sarah, to see if Helen’s making any headway. Sarah’s
still tapping her foot to the tune blaring from her phone. I guess that’s my
answer.
“You
watch the news, Sarah, don’t you? Now we’re learning it’s not bad enough they
get thrown away like trash, now sometimes those little body parts are being
sold, like as if they were baseball cards or, I don’t know, French fries. Just
a cheap commodity to be bought and sold, consumed for somebody else’s purposes.
Don’t you see how wrong this is, Sarah? How can you be a part of it?”
“Just
a minute. I’m not part of it, but I do support a woman’s right to choose. And
yeah, I saw those videos that supposedly prove clinics are selling tissue.
First of all, they were taken out of context. Remember, there’s a huge need for
medical research, stem cells, things like that. Wouldn’t you rather they made
use of that tissue instead of just discarding it? For God’s sake, my own mother
donated her body to medical science when she died so she’d have a purpose,
maybe help others by her death. Surely you can’t find anything wrong with
that.”
“Yes,
but Sarah, you said it yourself. She donated
her body to science. She made a choice
to share her organs that way. What choice do little unborn babies have? Besides,
no one was making a profit from your mother’s sacrifice. In fact, from what I
understand, donating to medical science actually costs the family money. Do I
have that right?”
“Oh,
I don’t know. It was a long time ago. I’d have to ask my father, and I’m not
going there with him. It was bad enough when we got her remains back after two
years – oh, never mind, that’s a whole ’nother subject. The point is, we’re
talking about utilizing tissue for scientific research. Now, that’s a worthy
cause. You can’t dispute that.”
I
stick a piece of gum in my mouth. I’m beginning to feel a bit weird standing
here not saying anything, but I’m also starting to realize how little I
actually know about this whole issue. I vaguely recall hearing about Convenient
Conception abortionists haggling over the price of fetal body parts when they
didn’t realize they were being filmed by some brave undercover reporter. But
what I remember wouldn’t even fit on this gum wrapper.
“I’m
not disagreeing with the cause, just the means and the motivation,” Helen
responds. “No one disagrees that we need to learn how the human body works and
be able to harvest things for transplants. I carry an organ donor card myself,
Sarah. The issue is how and why is this being done? It’s being done on the
backs of helpless infants and uninformed moms who don’t realize what they’re
getting themselves into. I’ve talked to some of them. And to some of their
partners, the dads of these babies.
“Here’s
the thing, Sarah. After I realized what was really going on, I couldn’t work at
that abortion mill anymore. I got out and now I volunteer for a crisis
pregnancy center, and I hear stories you wouldn’t believe. A lot of people
can’t forgive themselves for taking the lives of their babies. It’s literally
wrecking their lives. And the relationships between couples take a terrible
beating. Understandably. They’ve ended the life of their child, and paid dearly
in dollars and regret. After that, many of them can’t live with themselves or
each other! I personally know two married couples who aborted a child because
‘it wasn’t the right timing.’ They both ended up divorced, and they’ve both
expressed horrific guilt that ruined their marriages.”
Sarah
sighs and rolls her eyes.
“Sarah,
I’m sorry, I’m not trying to be dramatic. But you see, this is why I feel so
strongly about this subject. I see the effects on the parents, not to mention
what’s being done to the babies. These poor children aren’t choosing to
participate in medical research like your mother did, bless her heart – what a
lovely thing to do. They’re being victimized. The other thing that’s different
is, your mother got to die a natural death and then have her organs harvested –”
“No,
I didn’t say her organs were harvested. I said she gave her body for research,
so medical students could study the human body. Oh, never mind, I’m getting
upset talking about this. I’m sorry I brought it up.”
“Oh,
I’m sorry, too, Sarah. I apologize for getting that wrong.”
“It’s
fine. Can we just get off this topic?”
“Can
I say just one more thing, or will that be too upsetting for you?”
Sarah
shrugs.
“Fine,
but then let’s drop it. Please.”
“No
problem. I said my concern was the means and the motivation. We’ve already
talked about the means. Helpless, innocent children and, in many cases, naïve
parents who, if they had a chance to see their baby on ultrasound before making
their final decision, I guarantee you, many of them would change their minds.
That’s the means. Now, what’s the motivation? If this were being done
altruistically, with no cost attached, that might be one thing. But it’s not.
We’ve seen the footage. These places are making money off of killing these poor
kids. Who’s getting compensated? Not the babies, obviously. Not their parents,
no, they’re paying dearly for their legal right to end their child’s life, and perhaps
ruining their own. No, it’s the providers who are making money. And, Sarah,
please don’t believe it when you hear they want to keep abortion ‘safe, legal
and rare.’ If that were the case, Abby Johnson wouldn’t have gotten up in arms
when her higher ups told her she had to increase her abortion numbers. It’s a
fact. She writes about it in her book.”
“Yes,
I’ve heard of it. She wrote about how she had a good career and was well
treated by Planned Parenthood, then one day just up and quit. Left everybody in
the lurch, then started trash talking the organization she made a living off of
for I don’t know how many years. She’s a real fine character, that one.”
“Well,
I don’t know her personally, but I do know they tried to take her to court and
lost. That should tell you something. In any case, she claims in her book that
when funds got tight, the clinic directors were told to increase their volume
of abortions. Even though they promised her when she came on board that their
mission was to make birth control available so there would be fewer abortions.
When Abby pointed that out, she got in trouble. Got a formal reprimand, I
think. What does that tell you?”
Sarah’s
not buying it.
“It
tells me I don’t know the whole story and shouldn’t make a judgment about
somebody else’s work life.”
“Fair
enough. But the bottom line is, they wanted her to start pushing the abortion
option in her clinic and she wouldn’t do it. Because she believed in their
purpose to reduce unwanted pregnancy, but now they were asking her to increase
her clinic’s death rate so they could make money! Doesn’t that seem to go along
with what we’re finding out about the sale of body parts?”
Sarah
rallies.
“Well,
what would you suggest? Adoption is available, but I don’t see people like you
lining up to take in any of the 700,000 kids who get beaten up in their homes
every year. Or am I wrong about that? Are you offering to step up and adopt
some of the desperate kids being passed around in foster care because their
parents beat the crap out of them? Or because they’re deformed or disabled and
nobody wants them?”
I
shudder at that last statement. Too close to home?
Sarah
pauses, waiting for a response. Helen, caught off guard, is rendered momentarily
speechless. Sarah presses her advantage.
“I
didn’t think so. Well, maybe when the religious right starts coming up with
homes and money for abused and unwanted children, instead of inflicting its
patriarchal value system on women, maybe then I’ll think about changing camps.”
I
wish desperately that I could think of some way to extricate Helen from the wall
Sarah’s backed her up against, but I’ve got nothing. Fortunately, Helen finds
her voice.
“Well,
Sarah, just because I’m not in a position to adopt doesn’t make it a bad
option. From what I understand, many couples want to adopt, but it’s a very
costly and difficult process. Not everyone gets approved, for instance. And
also –”
“You
know, Helen, I’m glad you brought that up. There’s a lot of gay couples who
want to adopt, but some religious agencies would rather go out of business than
place a child with them. What do you say to that?”
Sarah
pauses, then looks her opponent right in the eye. Helen looks away.
“Sarah,
this is a touchy subject,” she begins.
“You
bet it is!” Sarah retorts. “My brother’s gay, and one day he may want to adopt
one of the kids we’ve been talking about, and people like you will turn him
down on one hand, and condemn abortionists on the other.”
While
witnessing this exchange, I marvel at the intelligence of both women. Coming
from completely opposite positions, each has managed to hold her own and behave
civilly, no thanks to yours truly, who’s doing about as much good as a broken umbrella
in a hurricane. It’s exactly the sort of debate I’d give an “A” to in my
government class. I do wish, though, that Helen was more prepared for Sarah’s
reference to the gay rights issue. Now that same sex marriage is legal, we’re
going to see more gay couples looking to adopt. I’m not an expert on this
subject, but the questions my students throw at me force me to be at least
cursorily aware of current events. The articles I’ve read suggest same sex
parenting isn’t an optimal environment for raising kids. In fact, when a
Louisiana court considered the case for gay marriage before it became law of
the land, four adults raised by gay parents testified that their upbringings
were hugely dysfunctional.*
But
the sticky question remains: if a decision is to be made between aborting a
child or placing it for adoption with gay parents, on which side should we as a
society err?
Helen
stands wordlessly, apparently taking great interest in a candy wrapper someone
tossed into the gutter. Sarah holds her ground.
“And
while we’re on the subject of unfairness, suppose a woman’s been raped? Or
worse – suppose a young girl’s the victim of incest. Some low-life father or
uncle robs the poor kid of her innocence, and now you want to force her to
carry that baby to term? You’re not even gonna make an exception for that?”
“Y’know,
I’m glad you brought that up, Sarah,” Helen responds, clearly relieved to get
away from the subject of gay adoption. “I’ve done some reading on that subject.
I struggle with that same question because you’re right, it doesn’t seem fair.
Here’s what I’ve learned. In cases of incest, when a young girl gets pregnant
after having been molested by a family member, often she wants to keep the
child. She’s been horribly mistreated and is somewhat comforted by the thought
of having someone of her own to love and be loved by. Oftentimes, it’s the
abuser – and sometimes, shamefully, the girl’s own mother, to whom she may have
confided the abuse – who insist on an abortion, so no one will know what’s been
going on. That goes directly against what the victim wants, because she knows
her pregnancy will expose what’s been happening to her. See, Sarah? The
abortion is actually a second victimization, forced on her by those who don’t
want the truth to come out.”
“Well,
what about other rape victims? You’re going to impose a nine-month sentence on
them for a violent crime they’d like to move on from? Hardly seems fair.”
“What
isn’t fair, Sarah, is inflicting a lifetime of regret on someone who was
already victimized. The reading I’ve done suggests that many rape victims feel
almost secondarily raped when they undergo an abortion. The first crime they
had no say over; a man brutally invaded their bodies. But when they allow an
abortionist to invade them a second time, they have no one to blame but
themselves. Studies show these women have physical and psychological effects –
PTSD, pretty much – that plague them years after they would have delivered the
rapist’s child.
“Is
it fair to have to give birth to an unplanned child conceived through violence?
Perhaps not. Is it hard? You bet. But many women who’ve been in this position
say they’re glad they chose to continue their pregnancy, whether they decided
to parent their child or seek an adoptive family. Others express huge regret
after choosing abortion.”
Sarah
looks ready to open her mouth, but gets beaten to the punch by an older woman
who jumps into the conversation. She appears to be in her 60’s, with hair that
looks like it wants to turn white, but got stuck in the same in-between shade
my mother ended up with. Mom refers disparagingly to her undecided hair color
as “iron gray.”
“Excuse
me, ladies,” the third woman begins. “Would you mind if I added my two cents?”
*The testimony Tom is
referencing is detailed in http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/jan/8/gay-couples-children-oppose-same-sex-marriage-tell/
and http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/lauretta-brown/adults-raised-gay-couples-speak-out-against-gay-marriage-federal-court.